Now, if it were more like 200%, then I would feel different, but it’s clearly not. Even if AlDente extends my battery lifespan by 25%, I don’t feel like it’s worth the additional annoyance. With the default macOS stuff, it’s not necessary.ģ) Battery replacements aren’t too expensive. In the past, I had tons of shit in my menu bar and I would sometimes have to chase down compatibility issues with macOS updates.Ģ) AlDente comes with some maintenance stuff that you have to do occasionally if you don’t want the calibration thrown way off. With this application, you have the peace of mind of your. The application comes with a user-friendly interface and has access to a lot of settings and features. This is likely why third-party apps like coconutBattery often show lower “health” than macOS does.ĮDIT: I personally do not believe AlDente is harmful, but given that I question its usefulness, I don’t have it installed because:ġ) I like to keep the third-party utilities on my Mac to a minimum. BatteryBar is an intuitive and lightweight battery performance monitoring application that comes with an agile way to monitor your battery over time to calculate precise assessments. And, unlike the software you referenced above, it's built in and free. Optimized battery charging will monitor charge rate. I am currently using it with a USB-C monitor which acts as both the display cable and charge cable, and have noticed that. If the computer is connected to the charger, it's not using charge cycles. Once it gets to that point, is then stops charging and is supposed to 'sail' by letting it drop to 75 before charging back to 80. I agree that letting your battery sit at 100% all of the time is not good for the battery, but that’s actually impossible with a modern Mac because “battery health management” will dial down what “100%” means if you’re constantly plugged in. Hi all, Im currently using AlDente Pro on my M1 Air which limits battery charging to 80. My skepticism is about whether AlDente does a better job of preserving battery health than what’s built into macOS. I have no doubt that Apple's feature would work well, however, I'm pretty sure that it's dumbed down. The jump from not using al dente to using al dente is much greater than going from al dente to al dente pro. It’s just that modern versions of macOS have features that limit the charge levels (“battery health management” and “optimized battery charging”). I'm wondering which one would be better to use: the new macOS feature or Al Dente. If they could prolong the battery health to a maximum, that could decrease the amount of people replacing the battery or buying a new system. Oh, I’m not questioning the 20% to 80% thing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |